ManifoldGen

FLUX.2 [dev] 对比 GPT Image 2

FLUX.2 [dev] 对比 GPT Image 2：您应该使用哪个 AI 图像模型？

Verdict

对于批量生成，请使用 FLUX.2 [dev]：每张图像 $0.04，价格是 GPT Image 2 的六分之一，对于大多数艺术和产品工作具有强大的提示遵循能力。仅在指令较长且结构化时，才为 GPT Image 2 支付每张 $0.24：它在 ManifoldGen 上对于复杂布局和多约束简报具有最强的指令遵循能力。请在 /tools/flux-2 和 /tools/gpt-image 试用两者。

FLUX.2 [dev]

  • ✓每张图像 $0.04，日常生成的开放权重主力
  • ✓对风格、产品和场景的提示遵循能力强
  • ✓批量生产比 GPT Image 2 便宜六倍
Open FLUX.2 [dev] →

GPT Image 2

  • ✓以 $0.24 每张图像提供最强的指令遵循能力
  • ✓处理包含多个约束的长结构化简报
  • ✓对于需要精确元素放置的布局可靠
Open GPT Image 2 →

Specs side by side

FLUX.2 [dev]GPT Image 2
每张图像价格$0.04$0.24
指令遵循强大的通用遵循能力平台最强
100张图片的成本$4.00$24.00
最佳工作负载大批量艺术图和产品图复杂受限的简报
权重开放权重专有
工具页面/tools/flux-2/tools/gpt-image
供应商Black Forest LabsOpenAI

FLUX.2 [dev] and GPT Image 2 on real prompts

Genuine ManifoldGen generations from our public gallery — hover any card for its prompt.

a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, gentle reflected light, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, gentle reflected light, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, high-end design magazine photography, gentle reflected light, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, high-end design magazine photography, gentle reflected light, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, crisp material detail, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, crisp material detail, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, gentle reflected light, terracotta and pale sky blue palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, gentle reflected light, terracotta and pale sky blue palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, gentle reflected light, rust and sage palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, gentle reflected light, rust and sage palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, atmospheric depth, moss green and cream palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, atmospheric depth, moss green and cream palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, high-end design magazine photography, atmospheric depth, terracotta and pale sky blue palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, high-end design magazine photography, atmospheric depth, terracotta and pale sky blue palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, weathered tactile surfaces, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark
a cliffside observatory in crisp winter sunlight, cinematic architectural photography, weathered tactile surfaces, indigo and pearl palette, no people, no text, no logo, no watermark

Choose FLUX.2 [dev] if

  • 如果您每天生成数十到数百张图片，请选择 FLUX.2 [dev]
  • 如果标准场景和风格提示词已经满足您的需求，请选择 FLUX.2 [dev]
  • 如果单张图片预算是硬性限制，请选择 FLUX.2 [dev]

Choose GPT Image 2 if

  • 如果您的提示词包含许多明确要求，请选择 GPT Image 2
  • 如果布局精度比单位成本更重要，请选择 GPT Image 2
  • 对于一次性主图且不允许重试的情况，请选择 GPT Image 2

Frequently asked questions

+GPT Image 2 与 FLUX.2 [dev] 相比价格如何？

GPT Image 2 每张图片收费 0.24 美元，而 FLUX.2 [dev] 每张 0.04 美元，因此 GPT Image 2 贵六倍。生成 100 张图片，GPT Image 2 花费 24 美元，而 FLUX.2 [dev] 只需 4 美元。

+我可以在同一个账户上测试这两个模型吗？

可以。两者都可以通过 /tools/flux-2 和 /tools/gpt-image 使用，使用同一个 ManifoldGen 密钥和信用余额，因此用自己的提示词比较它们只需支付每张图片的信用点数。

+哪个模型在遵循详细指令方面更出色？

GPT Image 2 在 ManifoldGen 上具有最强的指令遵循能力，这正是 0.24 美元溢价的价值所在。FLUX.2 [dev] 对典型创意提示词的遵循能力很强，但在长而多约束的简报上会有所放松。

More comparisons

Seedance vs WanSeedance vs LTXManifold Video vs SeedanceManifold Video vs WanWan vs LTXHappy Horse vs Seedance Image-to-VideoRA2V vs SeedanceSeedance Fast vs Seedance 2

Try both on your own prompt

FLUX.2 [dev] and GPT Image 2 run on the same balance — switch models mid-project.

Open StudioAPI docs